Here is the exact text of the 2004 lab analysis letter stating that Original Limu™ contained over 2500% more fucoidan than the look-alike product. A PDF format version of the original document (64kb) is also available for download. Additionally, you may wish to read some very enlightening comments about the validity of the analysis method used by the independent testing laboratory.
Consulting Analytical Chemist & Food Technologist.
[Contact details deleted intentionally]
May 19, 2004
Mr. Gary J. Raser, President,
The Limu Company,
610 Crescent Executive Court, Suite 110,
Lake Mary, Florida 32746,
USA
Dear Mr. Raser,
Molab Ltd. was engaged by The Limu Company via [name deleted intentionally], their manufacturer of Limu Extract, to examine the comparative Fucoidan contents of its Original Limu product and compare it to Vita Corp's Limu Plus. The results of the laboratory analysis are summarized below.
The examination was carried out on samples drawn by Molab from unopened bottles of the following products:
| Sample | Fucoidan Content |
|---|---|
| (1) Original Limu | 0.14 gms/100 mls |
| (2) Limu Plus | 0.005 gms/100 mls |
The microscopic examination confirms the fucoidan analyses.
The test procedure used, Methylene Blue precipitation, is one of the standard methods used for specifically determining sulphated polysaccharides, in this case Fucoidan. The procedure is used by Molab for seaweed extracts and seaweed products.
Yours Faithfully,
R.H.Molony MNZIFST. RSCCAC
Read the original letter (Adobe PDF file, 64kb).
Download the free Adobe Reader if you do not already have it.